Unrealistic, destabilizing, widely opposed—fuels conflict, lacks feasible strategy.

Former President Donald Trump's proposal for the U.S. to "take over" Gaza, amidst ongoing conflict in the region, has garnered significant rejection from both allies and adversaries. The idea was met with concern, as it could further complicate U.S. relations with key Middle Eastern countries, such as Israel, Egypt, and the broader Arab world. Allies, including European nations, have expressed skepticism over the feasibility and potential consequences of such a bold move. U.S. allies in the region, like Jordan and Saudi Arabia, fear the destabilizing effects that might arise from direct U.S. control over Gaza, which could exacerbate tensions, especially with Palestinian factions. Meanwhile, adversaries such as Iran and groups aligned with Hamas see it as another example of U.S. imperialism in the region. The proposal lacks clear support in international diplomacy, and critics argue it overlooks the complex, longstanding nature of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, favoring a more diplomatic approach.